Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Randomized phase II study comparing gemcitabine plus dacarbazine versus dacarbazine alone in patients with previously treated soft tissue sarcoma: A Spanish group for research on sarcomas study

  • Xavier García-del-Muro
  • , Antonio López-Pousa
  • , Joan Maurel
  • , Javier Martín
  • , Javier Martínez-Trufero
  • , Antonio Casado
  • , Auxiliadora Gómez-España
  • , Joaquín Fra
  • , Josefina Cruz
  • , Andrés Poveda
  • , Andrés Meana
  • , Carlos Pericay
  • , Ricardo Cubedo
  • , Jordi Rubió
  • , Ana De Juan
  • , Nuria Laínez
  • , Juan Antonio Carrasco
  • , Raquel De Andrés
  • , José M. Buesa
  • Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute
  • Teresa Sala Hospital Sant Pau
  • Hospital Clinic
  • Hospital Son Dureta
  • Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
  • Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid
  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía
  • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
  • Hospital Universitario de Canarias
  • Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia
  • Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
  • Hospital Parc Taulí
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Institute Catala Oncologia
  • Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
  • Hospital Universitario de Navarra
  • Hospital Xral Cies
  • Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa

Research output: Contribution to journalScientific articlepeer-review

267 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the activity and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine plus dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in a randomized, multicenter, phase II study using DTIC alone as a control arm. Patients and Methods: Patients with previously treated advanced STS were randomly assigned to receive either fixed-dose rate gemcitabine (10 mg/m2/min) at 1,800 mg/m2 followed by DTIC at 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks, or DTIC alone at 1,200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The primary end point of the study was progression-free rate (PFR) at 3 months. Results: From November 2005 to September 2008, 113 patients were included. PFR at 3 months was 56% for gemcitabine plus DTIC versus 37% for DTIC alone (P = .001). Median progression-free survival was 4.2 months versus 2 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.86; P = .005), and median overall survival was 16.8 months versus 8.2 months (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.90; P = .014); both favored the arm of gemcitabine plus DTIC. Gemcitabine plus DTIC was also associated with a higher objective response or higher stable disease rate than was DTIC alone (49% v 25%; P = .009). Severe toxicities were uncommon, and treatment discontinuation for toxicity was rare. Granulocytopenia was the more common serious adverse event, but febrile neutropenia was uncommon. Asthenia, emesis, and stomatitis were the most frequent nonhematologic effects. Conclusion: The combination of gemcitabine and DTIC is active and well tolerated in patients with STS, providing in this phase II randomized trial superior progression-free survival and overall survival than DTIC alone. This regimen constitutes a valuable therapeutic alternative for these patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2528-2533
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume29
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jun 2011
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized phase II study comparing gemcitabine plus dacarbazine versus dacarbazine alone in patients with previously treated soft tissue sarcoma: A Spanish group for research on sarcomas study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this