Abstract
In recent years, there has been renewed interest in referendums and citizen consultations at both national and local levels. These forms of direct democracy have been little studied so far. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for analyzing five case studies of local experiences that have highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of citizen consultation processes. Their strengths lie mainly in their flexibility and ability to help rulers make decisions in difficult situations while their weaknesses have to do, above all, with the difficulties of situating them in a context of debate and public information and also the limited interest citizens have shown in them.
| Translated title of the contribution | LOCAL CITIZEN CONSULTATIONS: BETWEEN GOVERNMENT LEGITIMATION AND CITIZEN EMPOWERME |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 9-42 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| Journal | Revista de Gestion Publica |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'LOCAL CITIZEN CONSULTATIONS: BETWEEN GOVERNMENT LEGITIMATION AND CITIZEN EMPOWERME'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver